lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: hires timestamps for netif_rx()
From
In article <20020116.211251.35505694.davem@redhat.com> you write:
| From: Wilson Yeung <wilson@whack.org>
| Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 18:45:02 -0800 (PST)
|
| Notice that all the timestamps are the same, which led me to believe that
| xtime was being gotten directly.
|
| This is what happens only if your CPU lacks a timestamp counter
| (TSC on x86). What kind of CPU are you performing this experiment
| on?

In the part of the message you snipped:
> That's interesting, because when I call do_gettimeofday() instead of
> get_fast_time(), I get different kinds of results that imply that these
> are not equivalent. I'm running the kernel on a PIII.

I would think that was short for "Pentium-III" which should have TSC.
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.872 / U:0.872 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site