lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 02:04:56 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au> wrote:

> Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > Unfortunately me have neither of those. This would mean I cannot benefit
from> > _these_ patches, but instead would need _others_
[...]
>
> In 3c59x.c, probably the biggest problem will be the call to issue_and_wait()
> in boomerang_start_xmit(). On a LAN which is experiencing heavy collision
rates> this can take as long as 2,000 PCI cycles (it's quite rare, and possibly
an> erratum). It is called under at least two spinlocks.
>
> In via-rhine, wait_for_reset() can busywait for up to ten milliseconds.
> via_rhine_tx_timeout() calls it from under a spinlock.
>
> In eepro100.c, wait_for_cmd_done() can busywait for one millisecond
> and is called multiple times under spinlock.

Did I get that right, as long as spinlocked no sense in conditional_schedule()
?

> Preemption will help _some_ of this, but by no means all, or enough.

Maybe we should really try to shorten the lock-times _first_. You mentioned a
way to find the bad guys?

Regards,
Stephan


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.247 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site