Messages in this thread | | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] klibc requirements | Date | 10 Jan 2002 10:41:49 -0800 |
| |
Followup to: <20020110173029.7616f752.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> By author: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > HPA, > gnu cpio (v 2.4.2) actually puts the contents in the *last* > entry, for hardlinks in "newc" format. This probably means you should > specify that if it's a found tuple, and c_filesize is non-zero, > overwrite the contents of the file. >
Check. I must admit this greatly surprises me (since it means that it needs to do more than one pass), but it certainly isn't making the spec any more difficult. As I said, it's a draft.
-hpa -- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <amsp@zytor.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |