Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Wed, 4 Apr 2001 15:25:22 +0200 (CEST) | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: a quest for a better scheduler |
| |
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Hubertus Franke wrote:
> It is not clear that yielding the same decision as the current > scheduler is the ultimate goal to shoot for, but it allows > comparision.
obviously the current scheduler is not cast into stone, it never was, never will be.
but determining whether the current behavior is possible in a different scheduler design is sure a good metric of how flexible that different scheduler design is.
Ingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |