Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 03 Apr 2001 09:32:56 -0400 | From | "Stephen E. Clark" <> | Subject | Re: uninteruptable sleep |
| |
That happened to me with 2.4.2-ac28 when I tried using DRM. I also got the following messages in syslog.
/var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:15:04 joker kernel: [drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed! /var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:15:04 joker kernel: [drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed! /var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:15:15 joker kernel: [drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed! /var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:15:15 joker kernel: [drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed! /var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:15:16 joker kernel: [drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed! /var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:15:40 joker kernel: [drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed! /var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:16:18 joker kernel: [drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed! /var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:16:31 joker kernel: [drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed! /var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:16:32 joker kernel: [drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed! /var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:16:45 joker kernel: [drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed! /var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:16:45 joker kernel: [drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed! /var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:16:48 joker kernel: [drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed! /var/log/messages.1:Mar 31 12:16:49 joker kernel: [drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed!/
So I turned off DRI in X 4.0.3
HTH Steve
Trevor Nichols wrote: > > Hi all, > > Since upgrading to the latest stable (2.4.3) kernel, I've noticed that > randomly some processes are going into an uninteruptable sleep and not > waking up at all. > > It's happened to nautilus and today just happened to mozilla also. > Another common related problem is the load averages go up to n + "normal" > where n is the number of processes that have gone uninteruptable sleep. > This is making me think it's a kernel related problem. > > I had one time where nautilus with 9 [presumably forked] processes of > itself go this way, causing load averages to go 9+, however the system > doesn't appear to be straining or strugling under that much load. > > The previous kernel version that I was using (2.4.1) did not have this > problem. > > One last thing, if this turns out to be a non-kernel problem, the > processes that *do* get stuck, are unkillable - even by root with SIGKILL. > Is there any way for it to be able to? :) So far I have to reboot each > time it happens. > > Best regards, > Trevor Nichols. > > ps please CC replies to my address. thanks. > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |