Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | Christoph Rohland <> | Subject | Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? | Date | 25 Apr 2001 09:25:19 +0200 |
| |
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On the other hand, sockets and shmem are both relatively large...
shmem is only large because the union is large. I introduced the direct swap array of size SHMEM_NR_DIRECT simply to take advantage of the union. We can decrease SHMEM_NR_DIRECT very easily. I am thinking about 1 or 5 which would mean that we allocate an indirect block for files bigger than 4k or 20k respectively.
The shmem_inode_info would then be 8 or 12 words.
Greetings Christoph
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |