Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 9 Mar 2001 20:42:43 +0100 | From | Jamie Lokier <> | Subject | Re: static scheduling - SCHED_IDLE? |
| |
Rik van Riel wrote: > > > Of course. Now we just need the code to determine when a task > > > is holding some kernel-side lock ;) > > > > couldn't it just be indicated on actual locking the resource? > > It could, but I doubt we would want this overhead on the locking...
Just raise the priority whenever the task's in kernel mode. Problem solved.
-- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |