Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 3 Mar 2001 14:48:56 -0700 | From | Cort Dougan <> | Subject | Re: Question about IRQ_PENDING/IRQ_REPLAY |
| |
} > I don't have a simple way on PPC to cause the interrupt to happen again, } > as you can imagine this is rather controller-specific. However, looking } > at the code closely, I couldn't figure out a case where having } > IRQ_PENDING in enable_irq() makes sense. } } It only makes sense for broken irq controllers. And most aren't. You can } likely ignore it - and note how even on an x86, most of the irq controller } code _does_ ignore it.
We do have broken interrupt controllers in this respect. We already have a way of handling it. Ben, take a look at set_lost(). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |