Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:25:47 +0200 | From | Francois Romieu <> | Subject | Re: RFC: configuring net interfaces |
| |
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@intrepid.pm.waw.pl> écrit : [...] > That's a physical interface like V.35 or RS232.
Ok.
[...] > > * n200, t200 ? > > What's that?
Parameters for retransmission of a trame specified in Q922. t200 is the timeout value and n200 the maximal number of retransmissions. They can be negocied and default to t200=1,5s, n200=3.
> > Do we put the crc type here ? > > I don't think so. Frame Relay uses only standard CRC. Correct me if I'm > wrong.
Ok.
[...] > > While we're here, could we agree on the notion of raw hdlc, i.e. : > > - no address, no command. crc present (ARPHRD_RAWHDLC ?); > > - no address, no command, no crc (ARPHRD_PATHOLOGICHDLC ?). > > Do we really need another ARPHRD for that? > BTW: What protocol(s) use such CRC-less HDLC?
No protocol I know. Sometime one just want to verify how a driver performs when he receives badly fscked data. One can live without it.
-- Ueimor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |