Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | Keith Owens <> | Subject | Re: [patch] serial console vs NMI watchdog | Date | Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:00:09 +1100 |
| |
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:53:40 +0100 (CET), Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: >it sure has an alternative. The 'cpus spinning' code calls touch_nmi() >within the busy loop, the polling code on the control CPU too. This is >sure more robust and catches lockup bugs in kdb too ...
Works for me. It even makes kdb simpler.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |