Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 6 Sep 2000 14:21:36 +0200 (IST) | From | Dan Aloni <> | Subject | Re: linux-2.4.0-test8-pre5 |
| |
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > - VIA ide driver update (well, rewrite - the old one was buggy and broken) > > Can someone explain this line from the VIA update? > #define FIT(v,min,max) (((v)>(max)?(max):(v))<(min)?(min):(v)) > Barring side effects on the variables, it is equivalent to > #define FIT(v,min,max) ((v)<(min)?(min):(v)) > > Why do I get the feeling that this was *not* the intent?
Correct. The last v should be replaced with whatever that we got from (v)>(max)?(max):(v), like:
#define FIT(v,min,max) (((v)>(max)?(max):(v))<(min)?(min):((v)>(max)?(max):(v)))
Or perhaps this is a lot better:
#define FIT(v,min,max) ((v)>(max)?(max):((v)<(min)?(min):(v)))
Dan Aloni (dax) karrde@callisto.yi.org
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |