Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Aug 2000 16:14:54 +0200 (MEST) | Subject | Re: Linux 2.4 Status | From | Bernd Kischnick <> |
| |
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Bernd Kischnick wrote: > > > > > > > Linux 2.4 Status/TODO Page > > > > > > Last modified: [tytso:20000809.0128EDT] > > [...] > > > Fix Exists But Isnt Merged > > [...] > > > * HFS is still broken > > > > I supplied the patch, and I've found it merged since 2.4.0-test2. > > So you can move that to "Fixed". > > The current HFS code doesn't work with HFS-formatted CD-ROM with 2k > block > size. I do not really know if it's HFS fs' fault or not, though. > Attempts to mount a 2k-block HFS formated CD-ROM produce the following > kernel message on 2.4.0-test5: > > Aug 9 08:49:03 localhost kernel: sr.c:Bad 2K block number requested (2 > 1) > I/O error: dev 0b:00, sector 2 > Aug 9 08:49:03 localhost kernel: hfs_fs: unable to read block > 0x00000002 > >from dev 0b:00 > Aug 9 08:49:03 localhost kernel: hfs_fs: Unable to read superblock > Aug 9 08:49:03 localhost kernel: sr.c:Bad 2K block number requested (0 > 1) > I/O error: dev 0b:00, sector 0 > Aug 9 08:49:03 localhost kernel: hfs_fs: unable to read block > 0x00000000 > >from dev 0b:00 > Aug 9 08:49:03 localhost kernel: hfs_fs: Unable to read block 0. > > I can see that hfs_fs and SCSI CD-ROM drivers don't agree on block > number > to be accessed. Is this not a bug? > > > Takashi Oe >
Ah, thank you for the exact description! This sure is a bug, but it should be fixable.
(The Status-Log entry "HFS is still broken" referred originally to HFS oopsing on any write attempt, which crept in somewhere before 2.3.99)
- Bernd
-- - Bernd Kischnick
email kisch@mindless.com tel +49-(0)511-18375
Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |