Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Aug 2000 23:40:20 -0400 (EDT) | From | Michael Rothwell <> | Subject | Re: Definitions: from LKML FAQ |
| |
I stand corrected, thank you sir. According to the FTp archive at tux.org, 2.3.99-pre1 appeared on Wed. March 15, 2000. It's right next to 2.3.9, which dates to 1999, so I imagine it was simple reading error on my part.
My apologies. It's been in "freeze" for four months, not eleven or twelve.
-Michael
You said...
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 11:13:53PM -0400, Michael Rothwell wrote: > > freeze," despite being in "2.4.0-test-X" stage for months, and > > "2.3.99-pre-X" for nearly a year. > > you keep repeating this misinformation, so I think it's worth correcting > you. > > 2.3.99pre1 : Tue Mar 14 > 2.4.0-test1: Thu May 25 > > (and Linus promptly went on holiday, so it may be more fair to start > counting 2.4.0-test from 2.4.0-test2: Fri Jun 23). > > On Monday August 9th, 1999 -- one year ago today -- Linus released > 2.3.13. that's a lot of revisions from .51 which was the final 2.3 > before 2.3.99-pre. > >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |