Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 07 Aug 2000 19:06:55 +0200 | From | Xuan Baldauf <> | Subject | Re: (reiserfs) Re: NFSv4 ACLs (was: ...ACL's and reiser...) |
| |
Linda Walsh wrote:
> [...] > What would you see the behavior being if process 'x' is chroot'ed > to directory 'y' and you blocked access to a directory above it's root? > Would the access checks still be done to the root of the filesystem or > just the 'root' of the process? > > -linda > > -- > Linda A Walsh | Trust Technology, Core Linux, SGI > law@sgi.com | Voice: (650) 933-5338
How is it done now? If some process chroots to /dir1/dir2, and tries to access /dir1/dir2/file, does the access succeed or fail after a "chmod 000 /dir1"? Is the current behaviour not incorrect, too?
Xuân. :o)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |