lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: (reiserfs) Re: NFSv4 ACLs (was: ...ACL's and reiser...)


Linda Walsh wrote:

> [...]
> What would you see the behavior being if process 'x' is chroot'ed
> to directory 'y' and you blocked access to a directory above it's root?
> Would the access checks still be done to the root of the filesystem or
> just the 'root' of the process?
>
> -linda
>
> --
> Linda A Walsh | Trust Technology, Core Linux, SGI
> law@sgi.com | Voice: (650) 933-5338

How is it done now? If some process chroots to /dir1/dir2, and tries to access
/dir1/dir2/file, does the access succeed or fail after a "chmod 000 /dir1"? Is the
current behaviour not incorrect, too?

Xuân. :o)



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.816 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site