Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 12 Aug 2000 11:16:43 -0300 (BRT) | From | Marcelo Tosatti <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.2.17pre16 |
| |
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, Toon van der Pas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 01:40:05PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > On 10 Aug 2000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > > > > > In article >E13MevS-0001Si-00@the-village.bc.nu>, > > > Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > > > >2.2.17pre16 > > > >o Fix long standing vm hang bug (Marcelo Tosatti) > > > > > > Just curious, is this supposed to fix the same bug as the (quite > > > different) patch from Marcelo (Subject: Re: oops 2.2.17pre15) in > > > <Pine.LNX.4.21.0008081914260.900-100000@freak.distro.conectiva> ? > > > > No. > > > > The patch included in 2.2.17pre16 fixes another problem. > > So what's the story about your three-line lock-patch for 2.2.17-pre15?
> Does it really solve the problem?
It does not seem to fix the __find_page problem, (octave reported an oops with my patch applied)
> You asked Andrea for comment, but I didn't see any reaction from him.
Neither I. :)
> Should we apply the patch on top of 2.2.17-pre16?
Yes.
Even if it does not fix the __find_page() thing, it fixes a bug and should be applied.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |