Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 8 Jul 2000 12:11:37 +0200 | From | Martin Mares <> | Subject | Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux |
| |
Hello!
> I admit that I'm very much a newbie here, but it seems that the effort to > make a faster printk() would be better off in other areas, since, in the > best of all worlds, it wouldn't ever be used during normal operation > anyway?
The problem is not to make a faster printk(), but to make all the other output faster (and preemptive) and still having _safe_ printk -- if we use printk for reporting of errors, it should work reliably.
Have a nice fortnight -- Martin `MJ' Mares <mj@ucw.cz> <mj@suse.cz> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/ "...take my advice, I don't use it anyway."
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |