Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:49:54 -0700 | From | TimO <> | Subject | Re: questions about patches and drivers |
| |
"Pre" patches are not additive, the previously applied patch must be reversed prior to applying the next. ie pre3-6.gz should be applied to the base pre3 tree and NOT applied to the pre3-5 tree.
Rikard Westlund wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > 1.I have installed the patch-2.3.99-pre1/2 and the pre3-3 (trying to get my > tulip quadport card to work). Now there is some new patches, like > pre3-4/5/6. I tried to add these but there were some files that got > rejected. Should these files not be added like "normal" patches, in > numerical order?? > > 2.All these pre3-X patches, will they form a patch-2.3.99-pre3 patch? > > 3.Anyone out there thats got a working (tulip.c)quadport card on the > 2.3.51(or later) kernel? > > 4.I know that Jeff Garzik is working on the tulip drivers, is there > anyone working/responsible on/for the eepro100.c driver? > > TIA > > Rikard Westlund > ______________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com >
-- =============== -- Tim --------------------==============++==============--------------------
-- Hebrews 10:10-14 (KJV)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |