Messages in this thread | | | From | James Sutherland <> | Subject | Re: Some questions about linux kernel. | Date | Tue, 21 Mar 2000 11:59:36 +0000 |
| |
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 16:52:03 -0600 (CST), you wrote:
>One thing I find disturbing about this whole debate is the assumption that >the only valid response a program can make to running out of memory is to >crash- and that it doesn't matter if the crash is a SEGV or a more >controlled cleanup & exit. > >One can even imagine better responses a program might have to being unable >to allocate memory than simply exit, too- initiating a garbage collection >to free up it's own internal memory, or having a prepared dialog box that >it can show that says "Unable to allocate memory- please close some other >programs and try again".
It's too late for garbage collection at this point. I would prefer a SIGTERM; the process can then attempt some sort of graceful exit (save the current file, whatever), followed by a SIGKILL.
Someone suggested something similar to SIGDANGER to indicate low memory, triggering any garbage collection routines you may have. This would be a better approach; try SIGDANGER, see if that helped. If not, SIGTERM. If that still hasn't freed anything, SIGKILL.
James.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |