Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 18 Mar 2000 13:29:51 -0800 (PST) | From | George Bonser <> | Subject | Re: Call for evaluation: new Intel eepro/100+, eepro100/S open source driver (but not GPL). Is it stable, neat, or on it's way |
| |
On Sat, 18 Mar 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Looked at the driver, doesn't set IFF_RUNNING to reflect the link state. > > Might not be a good candidate for things like channel bonding. > > Having had a look at it the driver is pretty clean for a cross platform driver, > its got uglies but most are caused by that. I think the best use of the info > is fixing the existing GPL driver to know about the hardware bugs they > document, the copy-checksum support and other bits.
And looking closer, it looks like what I was looking for is there but with different names. It looks like bdp->flags might be something like dev->flags and DF_LINK_UP might be something like IFF_RUNNING.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |