Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 10 Mar 2000 22:41:04 +0100 (CET) | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: PATCH: /proc/irq/ fix |
| |
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > /proc/interrupts is pretty long on bigger IO-APIC systems if all IRQ > > sources are listed. I'm not sure wether we want this. > > It might alert people that non-listed interrupts are doing something > strange. And it should not be much bigger than it is now -- there > should not be much "active but currently not used" interrupts.
64 on my box.
Ingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |