Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Fri, 4 Feb 2000 09:30:48 +0000 (GMT) | From | Tim Waugh <> | Subject | Re: parport_pc |
| |
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> This doesn't solve the problem with missing pci_alloc_consistent(),
Ah, that's a bug then.
Index: linux/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c diff -u linux/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c:1.23 linux/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c:1.24 --- linux/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c:1.23 Tue Feb 1 10:44:17 2000 +++ linux/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c Fri Feb 4 09:24:57 2000 @@ -1667,6 +1667,7 @@ p->dma = PARPORT_DMA_NONE; } +#ifdef CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_FIFO if (p->dma != PARPORT_DMA_NONE) { if (request_dma (p->dma, p->name)) { printk (KERN_WARNING "%s: dma %d in use, " @@ -1688,6 +1689,7 @@ } } } +#endif /* CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_FIFO */ } /* Done probing. Now put the port into a sensible start-up state. > furthermore I *have* FIFO (ECP) so I would hate to disable it just to > workaround for missing DMA.
Well, yes, fiddling with config options was always going to be a work-around -- I thought your original mail said that you were after a short-term fix as well. Making pci_alloc_consistent work properly is obviously the solution we all want.
Tim. */
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |