Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 20 Feb 2000 21:40:09 -0800 (PST) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: Patch: linux-2.3.47pre6 has conflicting definitions of QUEUE_EMPTY |
| |
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000 willy@thepuffingroup.com wrote: > > Did you notice that we currently have 3 `generic' implementations of > doubly-linked lists? <linux/list.h> <linux/lists.h> and <linux/dlists.h>. > dlists.h is _completely_ unused. lists.h is used by h8, as you noticed, > and sysctl. list.h is used in a variety of places. I'm kind of tempted > to put together a patch removing lists.h, but dlists.h should be deleted > before anyone uses it accidentally.
I'd appreciate a patch. The <linux/lists.h> thing tries to be BSD-compatible, but is just generally inferior to the regular list.h, and yes, if somebody sends me a patch to remove the two other ones I won't mind...
Linus
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |