lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Scheduled Transfer Protocol on Linux
    > 
    > Yes, I can see market for such beasts. Right now the de-facto
    > model for "networked" disks is FiberChannel.
    >
    > How exactly would STP interface differ from FC ?
    > E.g. how STP would be better than FC ?

    Less massive protocol management.




    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:8.500 / U:0.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site