Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 13 Feb 2000 16:38:58 -0800 (PST) | From | Matthew Jacob <> | Subject | Re: Scheduled Transfer Protocol on Linux |
| |
> > Yes, I can see market for such beasts. Right now the de-facto > model for "networked" disks is FiberChannel. > > How exactly would STP interface differ from FC ? > E.g. how STP would be better than FC ?
Less massive protocol management.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |