Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:22:37 +0100 | From | Simon Huggins <> | Subject | Re: kernel-doc minor fix |
| |
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 04:41:44PM +0200, Jani Monoses wrote: > --- /usr/src/linux/scripts/kernel-doc Tue Dec 12 11:25:59 2000 > +++ kernel-doc Sat Dec 16 15:53:17 2000 > @@ -664,10 +664,11 @@
> ## > # takes a function prototype and spits out all the details > -# stored in the global arrays/hsahes. > +# stored in the global arrays/hashes. > sub dump_function { > my $prototype = shift @_;
> + $prototype =~ s/^const+ //; > $prototype =~ s/^static+ //; > $prototype =~ s/^extern+ //; > $prototype =~ s/^inline+ //;
Since when did C accept constttttttttttttttttttt and staticcccccccc? etc.
Should that be " +" not "+ " or is someone just trying to confuse me? Or did someone try to mean s/foo//g by adding a +?
Yours confusedly,
Simon.
-- [ "Therapy is expensive. Popping bubble wrap is cheap. You choose." ] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |