Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:01:41 -0500 | From | Timur Tabi <> | Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Possible C++ safe header project - Re:[Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules |
| |
** Reply to message from Stephen Satchell <spamfilter@fluent-access.com> on Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:54:46 -0700
> Linus has the final say, of course, but to suggest that any changes that > remove name collisions between C and C++ be rejected out of hand has the > potential for shooting ourselves in the foot. I'd rather do it slowly > *now* instead of having to do it wholesale when the tools force us.
I agree. I think removed C++ reserved keywords from the header files should be the FIRST priority, not the last. How many are there, anyway?
new delete virtual class operator
That's all I can think of now.
-- Timur Tabi - ttabi@interactivesi.com Interactive Silicon - http://www.interactivesi.com
When replying to a mailing-list message, please direct the reply to the mailing list only. Don't send another copy to me. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |