Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:24:58 -0500 (CDT) | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: hdparm -d 1 fail test9-pre8 |
| |
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote: > In order for hdparm -d 1 to work in test9-pre8, I had to reverse > this change. (Without being able to enable dma, performance here > is muy el-stinko;-) Is enabling dma manually now forbidden? (or > am I maybe missing something else?)
If this change broke your DMA enabling, I think there are other bugs lurking in the code...
Can you provide a "diff -u " of dmesg, output, with, and without the change below?
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |