lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: ordered memory access
On 30 Sep 1999, Jes Sorensen wrote:

>Aren't according to what architecture? Some architectures can only

Yes, but as we was talking about common code so you can't assume that you
are running on i386 (on i386 the lock on the bus alwyas enforce ordering).

>Intuitively I think it makes sense to do so, and I doubt it will be a
>performance hit at all, but I am just guessing here.

On alpha you'll avoid some mb/wmb additional asm instruction ;).

If you don't test atomically the retval it make no sense to me to enforce
ordering so the alpha implementation looks fine to me.

Andrea


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.143 / U:0.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site