Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: bug in 2.3.18ac9 net/Config.in | From | Jes Sorensen <> | Date | 28 Sep 1999 23:49:16 +0200 |
| |
>>>>> "David" == David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> writes:
David> On 28 Sep 1999, Jes Sorensen wrote: >> make config & oldconfig are the references here, there have always >> been problems with the others. The Alpha is known to work and I try >> to test my changes on it.
David> I've _never_ had a single problem with menuconfig.
I have seen problems in the past, the "forget to deal with default values for new options" for example. It is possible that menuconfig has been fixed since then, but when you start getting lots of bug reports from people because they ran some strange thing instead of oldconfig you get really annoyed and tell your users to use what you know works.
David> I'd guess that most people outside the die-hard haxxor-'133+ David> uses menuconfig & xconfig. They are simply more convenient and David> easy to handle.
I suspect most developers use the methods, they are nice and have always been reliable. Whether new ones are more convenient is highly discussable ;-)
Jes
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |