Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Sep 1999 17:51:47 +0300 | From | Matti Aarnio <> | Subject | Re: 2.3.18ac8 doesn't detect tulip (again!) |
| |
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 03:18:43PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > It looks right. However its the wrong thing to fix. > The device, vendor order is odd. > Having it one way around for pci_id and the other for > the subsystem is lunacy. > > I think the subsystem idea in the tulip driver should > be flipped instead ?
How the chip->id.pci_mask and chip->id.subsystem_mask are made ? And what are the values that are then compared.
This relates to the question of how those two variables must be constructed.
> Alan
/Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@sonera.fi>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |