lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Accountability

On 14-Sep-99 Colin McCormack wrote:
> I looked at the patch, it didn't look unstable, unclean or insubstantial. It
> looked like a fairly straight-forward and elegant mod, to me.

Hm, it looks machine-dependent, incomplete, fragile and not ported to 2.3.
There's no way this is 2.2 material, and there's a fair amount of work before
its ready for the mainstream. Its not obvious that the author even wants it in
the mainstream kernel (which may be a huge liability for him, since it looks
like its part of a research project).

Anyway, since its currently a fairly self-contained patch, if you really need
it for 2.2 there shouldn't be a problem with applying it yourself?

J

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.578 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site