lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Accountability
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Colin McCormack wrote:

>>>>A suitable fashion means someone submits it to Linus and promises to
>maintain
>>>> it and fix it.
>>>
>>> Is this documented somewhere?
>>
>> 5 years of tradition
>
>I take that to mean `no'.

I take that to mean you haven't read linux-kernel.

>Good input filtering? I've never seen anyone be told `no' because their
>patches were too large (in fact, as far as I can see, large slabs of egcs
>are farmed out to largely independent groups, as has effectively happened
>with ISDN under Linux), nor because one of the developers' machines
>doesn't have bz2.

Input filtering isn't by size, it's content.

>Additionally, coins don't get stuck on `no' for things like GGI.

They seem to be doing just fine.


You have that air of contemptuousness about your posts...

-George Greer


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.045 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site