Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 7 Aug 1999 16:06:41 +0200 (CEST) | Subject | Re: 2.2.10-ac<x> / 2.2.11-pre<x> NFS client problem & bugfix | From | Trond Myklebust <> |
| |
>>>>> " " == Steven N Hirsch <shirsch@adelphia.net> writes:
> On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: >> What do you think of disabling negative dentry caching entirely >> when acregmin is set to zero? Other UNIXes don't cache them at >> all, at least not by default: >> >> OSF1 V4.0 alpha (NFS v3) SunOS 4.x Solaris 5.5.2 (NFS v3) >> Solaris 5.7 (NFS v3) Ultrix 4.4 RISC HP-UX B.10.20
> Frank, Trond,
> Just to avoid confusing the masses (among which I count > myself), can you clarify whether this problem exists in stock > 2.2.10 or Alan's proposed-2.2.11-* patches? From a quick read > of nfs/dir.c, it does not appear that nfs_renew_times() is > being called on "goto out_valid".
> May I assume that this discussion is particular to -acXX and/or > the NFS3 patches?
It seems to me to be particular only to -acXX. As far as I can see, bothe stock 2.2.10 and NFSv3 are doing the right thing.
Cheers, Trond
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |