Messages in this thread | | | From | (Zygo Blaxell) | Subject | Re: idea: MAC level compression & crypto | Date | Tue, 31 Aug 1999 05:06:31 GMT |
| |
>On Aug 29, Ralf Baechle wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 12:10:34AM +0300, Elmer Joandi wrote: >> > I feel I am been missing possibility for rot13 transformation of all IP >> > packets for longer. >> >> Note that ROT13 so many years after it's invention it no longer secure. >> The recommendation these days is tripple ROT13 ;-) > >be carefull: tripple-ROT13 still might be considered a (nuclear?!) weapon >in some (very) western countries ;-)) >we really have to stay with single-ROT13 for hooks...
Hmmm...now is that triple-encrypt, or encrypt-decrypt-encrypt?
ROT39(x) == ROT13(ROT-13(ROT13(x))) == ROT13(x)
How about ROT13 with double the number of key bits? That would be...
ROT169(x) == ROT(169%26)(x) == ROT13(x)
This encryption algorithm resists all attempts to strengthen it! It must be Clipper-ROT13!
;-)
-- I don't speak for Corel, I just work for them. Use zygob@corel.ca for work, zblaxell@furryterror.org for play, and zblaxell@feedme.hungrycats.org for PGP. PGP fingerprint: 01 94 0F B3 46 B7 71 C3 D4 98 39 99 1B 34 45 A1 PGP public key: http://www.hungrycats.org/~zblaxell/pgp-public.txt
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |