lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.2.11 unstable?
At Tue, 24 Aug 1999 15:29:59 +0100,
Jon Masters <mastersj@periscope-systems.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

> Letme clarify somethingfor all of you who think it's a hardware failure -
> 2.2.10 works fine, and I've run tests on thememory, disks, etc... and there are
> *NO* problems. It*is* 2.2.11.

I've the problem with 2.2.11 too.
After I changed 2.2.9 to 2.2.11, and have run for a week, init process
shows very strange behavior, that is, it consumes CPU% 99.9, and
load average grow up to 80 or 90. While I run 2.2.9 or before, the same
hardware was very stable and worked fine.

Thanks,
Fumitoshi UKAI

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.540 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site