lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] the other __raw_writel's
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 02:46:24PM -0700, B. James Phillippe wrote:

> > On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 03:57:34PM -0700, B. James Phillippe wrote:
> >
> > > Isn't this because a "longword" is 32 bits? So the use of "q" for
> > > "quadword" is appropriate for a 64 bit operation.
> >
> > How confusing, on MIPS q stands for quadword, 128 bit.
>
> That is confusing, and most unfortunate. Redfining the word (and thus long
> and quad) is almost as broken as redefining the byte.

But a byte is only a foggy defined entity of a few bits anyway. There
were and are machines with != 8 bits per byte. That's why there is the
term octet. And why it's why the French comittee for keeping their
language made a wrong decission ...

Ralf

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.045 / U:0.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site