Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: info format (was Re: Linux 2.2.11pre4) | From | Andreas Schwab <> | Date | 12 Aug 1999 10:51:41 +0200 |
| |
"Robert G. Brown" <rgb@phy.duke.edu> writes:
|> On 9 Aug 1999, Andreas Schwab wrote: |> |> > "Robert G. Brown" <rgb@phy.duke.edu> writes: |> > |> > |> To take the discussion one step further, one of my own personal pet |> > |> peeves is out of date/incorrect/inconsistent/missing man pages. Lots of |> > |> people (myself included) habitually rely on man pages as THE RTFM |> > |> mechanism. It is infinitely annoying to read, e.g., the crypt() man |> > |> page and to see no reference to the fact that crypt, via libc6/glibc and |> > |> even some versions of libc5, now supports MD5 transparently or any |> > |> instructions on how to make that happen. Sure, it is in info libc, |> > |> three layers deep, as a crypt crossreference. info crypt, on the other |> > |> hand, returns the (obviously now obsolete) man page. |> > |> > The latest libc docs have an entry for crypt. If the manual is installed |> > properly then "info crypt" will get you here. |> |> Then manifestly it is installed incorrectly, as "info crypt" (in my |> near-virgin RH 6.0 system) just shows the (incorrect) man page.
When installing the glibc manual a bunch of links are added to the dir file by running install-info on a generated file. This also adds the crypt link.
Andreas.
-- Andreas Schwab "And now for something schwab@suse.de completely different." SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |