Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 5 Jul 1999 09:27:32 +0200 | From | Dominik Kubla <> | Subject | Re: Patch for 2.2.10 (Quelle surprise!) |
| |
On Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 10:44:38PM +0100, Riley Williams wrote: > Hi Dominik. ... > Here's what this box reports... > > Q> # uname -m > Q> i686 > Q> # uname -p > Q> unknown > > Anything wrong with that? ...
Yes: uname -p should return something meaningfull.
... > > At least on this system, `uname -p` doesn't return anything useful...
Yes Riley, i am well aware of this behaviour, now here is what i get on non-Linux systems:
"-m" "-p"
PC running NetBSD 1.3 i386 (error) RS6000 running AIX 4.3 003500271800 (error) Alpha running Digital Unix 4.0B alpha alpha SUN running Solaris 2.5.1 sun4u sparc SGI running Irix 6.2 IP25 mips HP9000 running HP/UX 10.20 9000/735 (error)
Looks like i got it the wrong way round: "-m" should have the specific architecture and "-p" the generic processor family... Need to check the manuals how it should be, please stay tuned...
Yours, Dominik Kubla
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |