Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Jul 1999 17:35:08 -0600 | From | yodaiken@chelm ... | Subject | Re: low priority soft RT? |
| |
On Thu, Jul 29, 1999 at 09:07:52PM +0200, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > Yes, but if you extended your range, you would have "deadlock with > > upperbound of minute" situation, which is very bad, also. > > What's wrong with simply promoting the SCHED_IDLE task to normal > priority while it's in the kernel?
You could just fix "goodness" to do a different calculation depending on the process state.
> That leaves only user-space deadlocks, e.g. a locked file, which I don't > think we should be worring about here.
> > -- Jamie > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |