lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: low priority soft RT?
On Thu, Jul 29, 1999 at 09:07:52PM +0200, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > Yes, but if you extended your range, you would have "deadlock with
> > upperbound of minute" situation, which is very bad, also.
>
> What's wrong with simply promoting the SCHED_IDLE task to normal
> priority while it's in the kernel?

You could just fix "goodness" to do a different calculation depending
on the process state.

> That leaves only user-space deadlocks, e.g. a locked file, which I don't
> think we should be worring about here.


>
> -- Jamie
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.047 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site