Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: PATCH: POSIX 1003.1b timer minor fixes | From | Ulrich Drepper <> | Date | 27 Jul 1999 22:49:06 -0700 |
| |
Robert de Vries <rhdv@rhdv.cistron.nl> writes:
> I disagree, because the system call overhead takes more time than the > execution of a switch statement.
You can add some clocks on user level but the handling of interrupts for timers et cannot efficiently be done at user level.
-- ---------------. drepper at gnu.org ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Cygnus Solutions `--' drepper at cygnus.com `------------------------
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |