lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: low priority soft RT?
On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 10:31:09PM +0200, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> That's why I think that any process that holds a lock should have its
> priority boosted to just above all other SCHED_OTHER/SCHED_IDLE
> processes. This should be done not only for SCHED_IDLE processes but
> also for those with a policy of SCHED_OTHER.

So we trade a single instruction on the common case for a complex
mess that will slow down everything and probably deadlock. And the
benefit of this change is?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.173 / U:1.876 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site