Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: The stability crisis | Date | Fri, 2 Jul 1999 14:12:42 +0200 (MEST) | From | (Rogier Wolff) |
| |
Pavel Machek wrote: > No. Dumping to on-disk partition is _very_ risky, because it is easy > to miss the right partition. Floppy is much safer because it is much > harder to hit harddisk this way.
In theory, when a system is "oopsing", it is unsafe to do anything.
In practise, I agree with you that writing to a harddisk is more dangerous than writing to a floppy.
On the other hand, having a system control (ioctl on a file?, sysctl?, /proc?) that tells the system: "Please use that for crash dumps", and requires the file to be appropriately sized and preallocated would, in my opinion, be safe enough. Once the system thinks: "this is going the wrong way", it should write out the messages buffer to the pre-determined blocks.
If those pre-determined block numbers are wrong (random pointer), then it is most likely that lots of other stuff was broken first, so that writing to disk is no longer possible.
Roger.
-- ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* ------ Microsoft SELLS you Windows, Linux GIVES you the whole house ------
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |