Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: glibc developers refuse to support user land fake FS syscalls | From | Ulrich Drepper <> | Date | 02 Jul 1999 18:00:08 -0700 |
| |
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU> writes:
> I don't know how often I repeated this already: > > LD_PRELOAD is a *hack*, not a solution. > > There have been enough uses of LD_PRELOAD over the years that perhaps > it's time to consider finding a clean way of giving that sort of > functionality.
Anything which influences the symbol lookup path in the dynamic linker is preventing optimizations (in the lookup process == faster startup and generally faster ld.so). I don't want this.
What's wrong with upcalls for these kind of situations?
-- ---------------. drepper at gnu.org ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Cygnus Solutions `--' drepper at cygnus.com `------------------------
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |