lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Memory hogs
On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Claus Fischer wrote:
>
> >I just see the danger that people think it's enough to stop there and have
>
> Yes, I don't think we should stop there. I agree that handling OOM
> conditions is a task for the kernel and not for userspace.

Then could you please integrate my little task chooser
into your OOM killer?

It's a piece of code that has been tested fairly well
and only needs some minor work. The only _real_ reason
I'm asking you this is that we can't have two conflicting
OOM patches out there...

Rik -- Open Source: you deserve to be in control of your data.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Le Reseau netwerksystemen BV: http://www.reseau.nl/ |
| Linux Memory Management site: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/ |
| Nederlandse Linux documentatie: http://www.nl.linux.org/ |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.057 / U:0.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site