Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 17 Jul 1999 22:05:11 +0200 (CEST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: Memory hogs |
| |
On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Claus Fischer wrote: > > >I just see the danger that people think it's enough to stop there and have > > Yes, I don't think we should stop there. I agree that handling OOM > conditions is a task for the kernel and not for userspace.
Then could you please integrate my little task chooser into your OOM killer?
It's a piece of code that has been tested fairly well and only needs some minor work. The only _real_ reason I'm asking you this is that we can't have two conflicting OOM patches out there...
Rik -- Open Source: you deserve to be in control of your data. +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Le Reseau netwerksystemen BV: http://www.reseau.nl/ | | Linux Memory Management site: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/ | | Nederlandse Linux documentatie: http://www.nl.linux.org/ | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |