Messages in this thread | | | From | "Khimenko Victor" <> | Date | Fri, 16 Jul 1999 13:55:02 +0400 (MSD) | Subject | Re: linux-kernel-digest V1 #4149 |
| |
In <Pine.LNX.3.96.990715233348.1338B-100000@walker1-46.reshall.ou.edu> cd_smith@ou.edu (cd_smith@ou.edu) wrote: > Err, we do have only one kind of thread of execution. A process is NOT a > thread of execution. A process is simply a container for threads (and, > in other implementations, resources like address space... but I think we > ought to move those back to the thread level and share via clone() like > we do now). That's it. Just a different type of group, exactly as I am > fairly certain we'll need to invent anyway.
Hmm. Why to limit it this way ? Why not have arbitrary ThreadGroups so you can have 10 threads in some http-database gateway to work with database, 10 different threads to work with network and all under ubrealla of the same process ?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |