lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.3: acl's?

On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Matthias Riese wrote:

> Up to now we did not experienced any fs corruption with the current patch,
> but we are missing feedback from other users, especially with heavy load
> and many concurrent accesses.

Only one comment on the ACL page disturbed me: the one about lower
performance. It was a little ambiguous. Performance hit is only taken when
you deal with inodes with ACL's set, right? i.e. I could have ACL support
turned on for a given filesystem, but no inodes using ACLs, and
performance would be identical, right?

Chris


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.046 / U:0.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site