Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 3 Jun 1999 14:38:40 +0100 (GMT) | From | Chris Evans <> | Subject | Re: 2.3: acl's? |
| |
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Matthias Riese wrote:
> Up to now we did not experienced any fs corruption with the current patch, > but we are missing feedback from other users, especially with heavy load > and many concurrent accesses.
Only one comment on the ACL page disturbed me: the one about lower performance. It was a little ambiguous. Performance hit is only taken when you deal with inodes with ACL's set, right? i.e. I could have ACL support turned on for a given filesystem, but no inodes using ACLs, and performance would be identical, right?
Chris
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |