lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Process migration -> MOSIX?
On Sat, Jun 26, 1999 at 09:53:08AM +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote:

> Some people pop up every time saying that the whole idea is bad
> because we can't restart network connections. My opinion is always
> that it doesn't really matter if we can't migrate 100% of the
> processes at first. Moreover, even if we get stuck and never will be
> able to migrate everything, then we can still note it in the
> "restrictions" section of the manual.

This example is only being used as a proof by example that it is impossible
to create a mechanism for process migration which is completly transparent
for applications. That is in some cases like the migration of network
resources the application has to get involved. Depending of the
implementation a nice side effect is that application will become more
tolerant against network failures.

Ralf

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.024 / U:0.448 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site