lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Socket stuck in LAST_ACK for days (2.2.10)
On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Brian Ristuccia wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 12:50:15PM -0700, dave@thor.sbay.org wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
> >
> > > tcp 1 38681 osiris.978.org:https c-b.com:2777 LAST_ACK
> > > - off (0.00/0/0)
> > >
> > > This socket stays stuck in LAST_ACK. It's been that way for like 2 days now.
> > > It's blocking that port. Is there any way I can make it go away so I can
> > > restart that daemon without rebooting?
> >
> > I've seen this too on several occasions since the 2.1.x days (At least
> > since the 2.1.9x time frame). I have been unable to reproduce it reliably,
> > or frequently, so I haven't done anything about it yet. I am fair
> > confident that this is due to severe packet loss.

I don't remember whether there was data in my receive queue, but I do
remember that on each occasion, there was a good size chunk of data in the
send queue. Your situation looks very similar to mine.

> > I can promise you that this never went away on my systems. It stayed there
> > until the next reboot.
>
> Hmm... Perhaps I could invite someone to muck around with GDB on my running
> kernel :)

I thought that using gdb on the kernel required kernel support? In any
case, can you provide the output of /proc/net/tcp to the list. Somebody
might be able to point you or myself in the right direction to finding
this bug.

> Hope this gets fixed.

Me too.

davez

--
Dave Zarzycki
http://thor.sbay.org/~dave/
http://www.sbay.net/



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.021 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site