Messages in this thread | | | From | (david parsons) | Subject | Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? | Date | 28 Jun 1999 10:50:56 -0700 |
| |
In article <linux.kernel.003d01bec17c$89a044c0$390101c0@d1>, Marco Ermini <mail@markoer.org> wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: Richard B. Johnson <root@chaos.analogic.com> >To: Marco Ermini <mail@markoer.org> >Cc: <vigorous@iname.com>; Linux Kernel Mailing List ><linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu> >Sent: Monday, June 28, 1999 1:46 PM >Subject: Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? > > >> On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Marco Ermini wrote: >> >> > IMHO Linux simply don't not need this >> > kind of utility, because: >> > >> > 1) The system simply works as is. I.e, do >> > you need a defrag for ext2? >> >> One exists and I have used it. > >But certainly EXT2 *don't need* it. I >never needed it. The fact that it >exists is just a confirmation about my >previous statement: all the tools you >need (and even the tools you *don't* >need!) already exists.
Not under one roof, though, and certainly not as well documented as the Norton Utilities are.
____ david parsons \bi/ If users would feel warm and fuzzy about having \/ Norton Utilities, let them.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |