lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jun]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [off-topic] Microsoft IP Stack
A very respectable response. 

Cheers.

________________________________________________________________
Shane R. Stixrud - Sr Network Engineer spgsrs@vmmc.org
Virgina Mason Medical Center http://www.vmmc.org


On Tue, 22 Jun 1999, Josh Cohen (Exchange) wrote:

> Just in response to a thread gone by...
>
> The Microsoft IP stack is a native implementation. It was written
> from scratch according to the relevant RFCs. It was re-written
> to take advantage of the Win32 API featureset to provide the most
> efficient implementation on our platform.
>
> While it is API compatible with the BSD/Unix implementation (sockets),
> it does not contain the BSD source code base, nor is it derived from it.
> (Except, of course, for API compatibility).
> In addition to the standard synchronous sockets API, it also provides
> win32 asynchronous I/O.
>
> As for the claim that we would never admit that Unix has provided
> an excellent heritage, that simply isn't true. In regard to this
> particular example, if memory serves, the original IP stacks weren't
> produced on Unix, but on DEC machines. (eg, PDP-11, VAX)
>
> --joshco
> Protocols. Microsoft.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.092 / U:1.564 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site