Messages in this thread | | | From | "Stephen C. Tweedie" <> | Date | Wed, 23 Jun 1999 17:36:15 +0100 (BST) | Subject | Re: Windows NT File Systems and Linux File Systems |
| |
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Jun 1999 09:06:34 -0600, "Jeff Merkey" <jmerkey@timpanogas.com> said:
> Bless your heart, you missed the point. Most of the stuff in NT is > geared towards parallelism, not disk vs. cache access.
You were making points about how a particular disk/cache architecture was good for parallelism. Linux shares many of the same architectural distinctions, and in 2.3, we are getting _very_ good parallelism out of the file and IO subsystems. Thanks, Ingo!
--Stephen
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |